|
Dallas/Fort
Worth (D/FW) International Airport's Transit Monitoring System

Passengers use the transit system at D/FW International
Airport to make
connections and to get back and forth to remote parking lots. The airport's
transit system transports most of the 60 million traveleers it handles
each
year, as well as the airport's 37,000 airline and support employees.
You need
a watch with a second hand to time air traffic at D/FW International
Airport. During peak periods, airplanes arrive or depart approximately
every 36 seconds on one of seven runways. The airport is capitalizing
on its central location, moderate climate and highway and rail connections,
all of which make it an efficient way to travel and ship cargo to destinations
in North America and around the world. As a result, the airport is expected
to be the world's busiest by the year 2000.
While these
statistics fuel efficient business operations and low unemployment rates,
they represent a major challenge for the airport's support mechanisms.
Each year, the airport's transit system, for example, moves nearly 60
million travelers as well as the airport's 37,000 airline and support
employees. Heavy air traffic and large distances make the airport a
challenging place to shuttle people under any conditions, and the airport's
automated guideway transit (AGT) system is one of the oldest and the
most complex in the country. The transit system is also one of the country's
most efficient-consistently achieving 98 to 99 percent reliability.
David Waters, train central controller, sits at the
command console that
monitors transit system operations at D/FW International Airport.
"Every
airport transit system in the country wants to achieve our numbers because
we are at the top," says Airport Train Manager, Ron White. "And
everyone wants to know how we do it with a system that was designed
and built in the early 1970s."
The answer,
he says, is due in large part to a computer-driven monitoring system
that combines an efficient in-house application program with the long-term
equipment reliability and support by its selected computing platform
vendor. The transit system was designed, built and tested from 1972
to 1974. White participated in that process. "We started with blank
paper on the drawing board because there was no operating airport transit
system to study," White recalls. "Instead, we worked with
other companies who were building prototype public transportation systems
to learn all that we could about operations," he notes. Working
with the design team, in-house programmers created a powerful application
in Assembly language that continues to the present day.
"We
called in several outside consultants to evaluate rewriting our application
software for the UNIX environment, but they all advised against it,"
White reports. "What we have works so well that we can't justify
an upgrade. That's a tremendous compliment to the application's original
developers and those who have continued to embellish it along the way."
The team
has been equally fortunate with the monitoring system's real-time computing
platform, supplied by MODCOMP of Fort Lauderdale, Fla. More than two
decades after installation, White has just completed his second upgrade
to computers at the transit system's central command station. Additional
computers located throughout the transit system and at the maintenance
facility were last upgraded in 1985. "One of the advantages of
this platform is that it is reliable. Equally importantly, new generations
are designed to support previous systems," he explains. "Long-term
users like ourselves are able to make systems last for decades with
a few cost-effective upgrades."
The guideway
transit system features 14 miles of track, with six different routes.
Some routes link terminals and are designed for connecting passengers.
Others link terminals to north and south remote parking lots. Two controllers
are on duty at the command console for most of the train system's 24-hour
service schedule. One controller monitors the 480-volt guideway power
and handles train malfunctions. The other controller supervises train
operations and calls for more trains when stations become crowded. Malfunctions
range from air conditioning outages to problems with braking or propulsion
systems. If a brake exceeds temperature, for example, the controller
will monitor the system and try to get the train into the next station
where it can be offloaded for maintenance. In cases of scheduled or
unscheduled maintenance, power can be shut down temporarily on a section
of track, and reactivated when procedures are completed. Buses provide
transportation for designated routes until train operation is restored.
One computer
at the central command station monitors system operations by communicating
with nine remote computers. An additional computer performs off-line
programming, testing and backup. The computers in wayside stations handle
input and output commands to trains operating in the area. They poll
trains for status updates every 200 ms. If two or three cars are linked
together, the lead train car collects input from the others and reports
it to the designated host computer.
White and
the maintenance staff recently upgraded the command center computers
to reach a system configuration designed to last for the next 10 years.
"The entire airport is being evaluated to develop a master plan
to support aggressive growth. As part of that plan, we anticipate retrofitting
our existing transit system, or building a completely new system. Our
current transit system needs to last until the new or updated system
can be designed and completed." The newly installed computers provide
enhanced reliability with multi-layer boards. They supply forward compatibility
by supporting both 16- and 32-bit processing and are backward compatible
with previous generation equipment, which exists in wayside stations
throughout the transit system. Although White does not plan to upgrade
to 32-bit technology, he can do so at any time by recompiling the application
program, avoiding a costly software rewrite. In that case, the central
computer, operating with a 32-bit operating system and application software,
would continue to interact with existing 16-bit computers located throughout
the system.

One of the nation's first airport transit systems
remains one of the most
reliable, thanks in part to reliable and efficient, long-lasting
MODCOMP
computing equipment, along with well-crafted in-house application
software.
While efficient
transportation is the goal of the transit system, safety is the first
priority. For that reason, the computer-driven monitoring system can
modify train speed, direction, and other factors but it cannot override
the built-in safety system. "Our system is designed to ensure safe
delivery of passengers to their destinations. There is no way that a
computer or a controller can put a train into an unsafe situation. The
system simply won't allow it," White explains. To properly manage
resources and cut costs, the number of trains placed into service is
adjusted to match passenger traffic predictions provided weekly by the
airlines. "During peak periods of the day, we have more trains
on the track. Likewise, some days of the week are busier than others,
so we prepare our system to handle more passengers. During peak holiday
rushes, every available train is on the track," White says.
Closed
circuit television monitors all stations. If trains are not able to
handle all those waiting to board, a controller calls for additional
trains to service that area. The controller also communicates directly
with waiting travelers over the public address system to let them know
that additional trains are on the way. Matching trains to traffic flow
is a careful balance that saves the airport thousands of dollars a year
in maintenance charges. "There is a direct correlation between
miles and maintenance for any train system," says White. "Every
mile we can save means reduced charges for labor and parts."
The long-term
reliability and performance of the transit monitoring system also reduces
expenses. An adept in-house programming staff and reliable computing
platform combine to save the airport hundreds of thousands of dollars.
"We have seen other older transit systems outlay millions of dollars
to upgrade equipment, while we spend only $250,000 for equipment we
will use for 10 or even 20 years," says White. This kind of fiscal
responsibility is practiced throughout airport operations. Operating
costs are at the lowest level in 10 years. As a result, landing fees
and terminal rents have been lowered. At the same time, revenues continue
to rise as a new runway paves the way for growth in passenger and cargo
traffic and newly negotiated contracts take effect. In this favorable
climate, there are few that doubt that this airport will be the world's
busiest by the start of the next millennium.
|